彩虹多多返点|百度词条

来源：彩虹多多邀请码2024-05-27 17:48

彩虹多多返点

天冷易冻膝快学几招护关节******

　　冷空气突袭，北京“一键入冬”，万物进入闭藏阶段。注重养生的朋友们，想必已经摩拳擦掌地筹备冬季养生方案了。除了进补，冬季适当的锻炼对人体是大为有益的。不过，这个时候我们一定要格外注意膝关节的保护，因为它比其他季节都更加脆弱容易受伤。今天，中医正骨科的医生就来跟大家分享几个冬季护膝的小妙招儿。

　　动作放轻缓锻炼前要热身

　　冬季来医院就诊的患者膝关节不适的比例大幅增加。

　　冬季人体为了保存能量，阳气内敛，气血内收，关节部分的血液循环远较其他季节更低一些。这种情况下，关节部分的韧带、肌肉弹性远不如平时，无论是久坐起身、日常行走还是锻炼，都容易出现韧带肌肉的拉伤。

　　所以，在改变体位和动作的时候，一定要轻缓，让关节有充分的适应过程，锻炼前一定要做好充分的热身，关节达到最佳状态以后再开始锻炼。

　　注重关节保暖护膝安排上

　　值得一提的是，大家在冬季锻炼的同时，务必要做好关节部分的保暖，防止出现不必要的损伤。

　　因其使用广泛且受季节影响大，膝关节的保暖尤为重要。冬季，在韧带和肌肉弹性下降的同时，对关节本身的保护力也会明显减弱。关节本身的稳定性下降，软骨、半月板这些缓冲功能的部分容易出现比平时更多的磨损。

　　所以，建议大家在平时佩戴护膝，既能一定程度上保暖，增强局部循环，又能对关节起到缓冲保护的作用，减慢退变进程，避免损伤。

　　再次强调，如果有关节病变，症状剧烈或反复出现，或者通过影像学检查确诊关节疾病的患者，还请及时就诊。

　　锻炼膝关节试试这两招儿

　　锻炼关节相关肌肉的耐力和稳定性对保护关节有很大作用，除了大家都知道的靠墙深蹲以外，下面再教大家两招锻炼膝关节的方法。

　　方法一　找一面墙，身体侧面对着墙面，坐姿，面部方向和墙面平行。用靠近墙的腿，膝盖外侧和墙之间夹住一块5-10cm厚度的轻软物品，如毛巾叠、泡沫块等。保持物品不掉落的情况下膝关节缓慢屈伸，小腿活动范围大约90°。从垂直于地面到伸平，再缓慢放回，10次一组，一侧做完后调整椅子位置换另一侧，根据自己情况做2-4组，每天一次，提高关节稳定性，纠正力线。

　　方法二　找一个单杠或者双杠，或者足够稳固能支撑自己下半身悬空的地方。支撑起下半身，悬空过程中两腿交替轻微抬起，然后像踩踏路上积水一样向下轻轻蹬踏，两腿快速交替。动作要轻快轻巧，两侧各蹬踏15次为一组，休息两三分钟后可以做下一组。大家可以根据自身情况一共进行2-4组，每天一次，这个动作对上身支撑能力有要求，所以请广大患者朋友量力而行。

　　除此之外，按摩也是一个好方法。大家可以尝试按揉髌骨周边的几个凹陷处，以按之轻微酸胀感为宜，每个位置30下为一组，还有腘窝里的委中穴，按揉20下为一组，每天早晚各两组即可，也可用热敷取代。文/许凌飞(北京世纪坛医院）

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.